紧凑型翻盖手机失势
结论 - 三星Galaxy Z Flip7不久前，三星的 Flip 系列还是无与伦比的。然而，随着 Flip7 的问世，这种情况已不复存在，部分原因是这款小巧的可折叠产品并没有像Galaxy Fold7 那样在设计上进行全面升级。
Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Galaxy Z Flip7，三星再次推出了一款吸引人的可折叠手机，但小米 Mix Flip 2 在几个方面做得更好。三星的电池相对较小，软件设计感觉并不完全适应新的盖板显示屏，欧洲版的 Exynos 2500 比骁龙 8 Elite 弱。在最新一代 Flip 上，卡顿再次成为一个主要问题，包括有时会出现非常明显的性能下降。
建议三星公司重新考虑 Flip 的外形，尤其是作为在日益激烈的竞争中脱颖而出的一种方式。
Pros+ 优质防水设计
+ 7 年更新
+ 明亮的可折叠 OLED 面板
+ 快速 SoCCons- 封面显示屏功能有限
- 电池容量小
- 充电慢
- 折痕比竞争对手更明显
- 严重节流
价格和供货情况 - SamsungGalaxy Z Flip7Galaxy Z Flip7 可直接从购买。256GB机型的零售价为1199欧元（约合1300美元），512GB机型的零售价为1319欧元（约合1435美元）。目前的在线价格约为 770 欧元（约合 835 美元），例如Amazon。提供三年保修（德国；可能因地区而异）。
$1,069.99Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Cell Phone, 512GB AI Smartphone, Unlocked Android, Long Battery Life, 2025, US 1 Yr Manufacturer Warranty, Blue Shadow
Table of Contents结论 - 三星Galaxy Z Flip7规格 - 三星Galaxy Z Flip7机身和功能 -Android 手机，屏幕更大软件和可持续性 - 长时间更新的三星手机摄像头 - 配备 OIS 的小型手机显示屏 - 采用 OLED 屏幕的可折叠手机性能、游戏、排放和电池续航时间 - 配备高端处理器的翻盖手机Notebookcheck 总体评分替代设备一览
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
规格 - 三星Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (Galaxy Z Flip7 Series)ProcessorSamsung Exynos 2500 10 x 1.8 - 3.3 GHzGraphics adapterSamsung Xclipse 950Memory12 GB , LPDDR5xDisplay6.90 inch 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixel 397 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, 2nd Screen: 4.1", 1048x948, Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB , 222 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, MiracastNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n75/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 6.5 x 166.7 x 75.2Battery4300 mAh Lithium-IonChargingwireless charging, fast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 16CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23 mm, OIS) + 12 MPix (f/2.2, 13 mm, wide), camera2API: level 3Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2, Videos @2160p/30fps)Additional featuresSpeakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, One UI 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | Dual-eSIM | IP48 | Supported File Systems for external storages: NTFS (only reading), FAT32, exFAT, SAR value: 0.689W/kg Head, 1.215W/kg Body, fanless, waterproofWeight188 g
Price1199 EuroAmazon$1,069.99LinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
机身和功能 -Android 手机，屏幕更大三星Galaxy Z Flip7（右）与 Flip7 FE（左）的比较与前 前代Galaxy Z Flip7 看起来更加时尚。最显著的变化是 4.1 英寸的显示屏更大了，现在几乎覆盖了整个正面。大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 用于保护背面和正面。
精心制作的机身也变得略微纤薄了一些，而且仍然通过了 IP48 认证，可以防尘，但不是完全防尘。小于 1 毫米的微粒理论上可以进入并阻塞铰链机构。
展开时，Flip7 的厚度为 6.5 毫米；合上时，厚度为 13.7 毫米。 折叠式.铰链由先进的铠甲铝制成，手感坚固，适合日常使用。
在功能方面，该设备提供不含 6 GHz 频段的 Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙 5.4 和带有线视频输出的 USB 3.2 Gen 1 端口。在使用固态硬盘（三星 PSSD T7）进行的拷贝测试中，传输速率达到了 325 MB/s。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
NetworkingSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
868 (min: 438) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
799 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼75%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
520 (min: 309) MBit/s ∼29%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1333 (min: 920) MBit/s ∼72%
Honor Magic V Flip802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
716 (min: 324) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
898 (min: 631) MBit/s ∼84%
Nubia Flip 5GWi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 472) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
986 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1759 (min: 1696) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1844 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GWi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000
723 (min: 659) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
623 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1816 (min: 900) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1501 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼81%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1063 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1306 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1440 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼78%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000
727 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
747 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1362 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1400 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼76%
展开后的尺寸对比
Nubia Flip 5G Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Honor Magic V Flip Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G DIN A6 ❌
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø520 (309-676) Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1333 (920-1573) Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø853 (438-950) Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø798 (780-816)
软件和可持续性 - 长时间更新的三星手机Galaxy Z Flip7预装Android 16系统及One UI 8界面，但不支持DeX模式。三星承诺该机型将获得长达七年的系统更新保障。测试时，其安全补丁日期显示为2025年8月1日，表明系统已获得最新安全防护。
在小巧的 4.1 英寸封面屏幕上，可以使用小部件（包括来自第三方的部件），也可以部分运行某些应用程序。不过，它仍然不能完全替代内屏。在这方面，其他制造商，如小米公司的 Mix Flip 2提供了更好的可用性。
三星支持客户维修，因为备件和合适的指南可直接从三星获得。该公司在可持续发展方面也表现出色。随附的报告提供了有关二氧化碳排放量和再生材料使用情况的详细信息。
摄像头 - 配备 OIS 的小型手机10 百万像素自拍
50MP 自拍与 Flip6.事实上，Flip7 内部的光学元件比 Flip6 稍差，因为传感器略微变小了。配备固定焦距的 10 百万像素摄像头可在日光下拍摄出清晰的照片和 4K60 视频。使用主摄像头拍摄的自拍照更具吸引力，盖板显示屏可用作取景器。
背面是双摄像头设置。主摄像头也用于 Galaxy S25拍摄出的照片效果不错。由于没有长焦镜头，它还必须用于变焦，最多可放大十倍。
超广角摄像头在日光下也能提供良好的效果，但边缘会有轻微模糊。
0.6x1x2x5x10倍（最大值）
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
3.4 ∆E5.6 ∆E3.7 ∆E4.3 ∆E4.2 ∆E6 ∆E4.1 ∆E2.2 ∆E3 ∆E3.9 ∆E4.3 ∆E6.5 ∆E3.9 ∆E3.6 ∆E5.3 ∆E7.5 ∆E3.6 ∆E6.5 ∆E9.9 ∆E5.5 ∆E1.9 ∆E2 ∆E1.9 ∆E3.4 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7: 4.42 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 9.93 ∆E25.8 ∆E43.8 ∆E33.9 ∆E32.4 ∆E37.8 ∆E54.2 ∆E41.6 ∆E26.3 ∆E30.1 ∆E23.4 ∆E52.7 ∆E54.5 ∆E22 ∆E38.6 ∆E24.7 ∆E54.6 ∆E33.7 ∆E40 ∆E52.9 ∆E53.8 ∆E44.8 ∆E34.6 ∆E23.5 ∆E13.6 ∆EColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7: 37.22 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 54.61 ∆E
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
显示屏 - 采用 OLED 屏幕的可折叠手机子像素结构Flip7 的可折叠主显示屏略有增大，达到 6.9 英寸，但 LTPO 面板仍只能提供 1080p 分辨率。因此，像素密度降至 400 ppi。在 APL18 测试中，亮度达到了 2,636 cd/m²，非常不错。在播放 HDR 视频时，我们测得的亮度为 2,431 cd/m²。
在亮度控制方面，三星采用了脉宽调制技术，这是 OLED 的典型技术。我们记录的 PWM 闪烁频率相对较低，最高为 480 赫兹。
1363cd/m²1359cd/m²1335cd/m²1368cd/m²1349cd/m²1342cd/m²1367cd/m²1354cd/m²1347cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1368 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1353.8 cd/m² Minimum: 0.73 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 98 %Center on Battery: 1349 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.06CCT: 6484 K
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.9"Xiaomi Mix Flip 2AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9"Honor Magic V FlipOLED, 2520x1080, 6.8"Nubia Flip 5GOLED, 2790x1188, 6.9"Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GDynamic AMOLED 2X, 2640x1080, 6.7"Screen-16%18%21%-19%Brightness middle (cd/m²)13491077 -20%1529 13%1164 -14%1210 -10%Brightness (cd/m²)13541036 -23%1535 13%1172 -13%1221 -10%Brightness Distribution (%)9895 -3%97 -1%97 -1%98 0%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *2.22.11 4%1.3 41%0.7 68%3.1 -41%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.33.62 -10%2.1 36%1.5 55%4.2 -27%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.62.3 -44%1.5 6%1.1 31%2 -25%Gamma2.06 107%2.155 102%2.22 99%2.2 100%2.05 107%CCT6484 100%6275 104%6303 103%6482 100%6666 98%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 HzAmplitude: 13.64 %Secondary Frequency: 480 HzThe display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8169 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
色彩准确度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.57 ms rise↘ 0.4795 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey0.64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.347 ms rise↘ 0.2975 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).
室外使用室外使用折痕清晰可见封面显示
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7AMOLED, 1048x948, 4.1"Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GSuper AMOLED, 720x748, 3.4"Honor Magic V FlipOLED, 1200x1092, 4"ScreenBrightness middle (cd/m²)14499931559Brightness (cd/m²)1460994Brightness Distribution (%)9895Black Level * (cd/m²)* ... smaller is better
子像素结构
室外使用
室外使用性能、游戏、排放和电池续航时间 - 配备高端处理器的翻盖手机在欧洲，Galaxy Z Flip7 专门配备了新的 Exynos 2500包括 Xclipse 950而在其他地区，速度更快的 骁龙8精英版Galaxy作为 SoC。在我们的基准测试中，三星芯片组在 Geekbench 6 中的速度比骁龙 8 Elite forGalaxy 中的速度慢 10%左右。 折叠7.
电池容量增至 4,300 mAh，与 Flip6可通过 USB-C 接口和高达 25 瓦的无线充电。查看 小米混合翻盖 2表明，三星急需在这方面做出改进。不过，Galaxy Flip7 在 Wi-Fi 测试中取得了近 19 小时的出色续航时间。
Geekbench 6.5 | 3DMark | GFXBench | Geekbench AI | CrossMark | Jetstream 2 Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreXiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3084 Points +24%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2703 Points +9%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
2478 Points Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (2012 - 2478, n=3)
2269 Points -8%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2072 Points -16%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3803, n=202, last 2 years)
1703 Points -31%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1700 Points -31%Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1016 Points -59% Multi-CoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
9317 Points +15%Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9183 Points +13%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
8098 Points Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (7563 - 8098, n=3)
7911 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6354 Points -22%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=202, last 2 years)
4981 Points -38%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4277 Points -47%Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2885 Points -64%3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited ScoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
26398 Points +32%Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
25743 Points +29%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
20027 Points Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
20027 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18949 Points -5%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11056 Points -45%Average of class Smartphone (271 - 28053, n=185, last 2 years)
10678 Points -47%Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
3136 Points -84% Wild Life ExtremeXiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
6538 Points +27%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
6126 Points +19%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
5166 Points Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
5166 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
4912 Points -5%Average of class Smartphone (61 - 7094, n=187, last 2 years)
2832 Points -45%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2823 Points -45%Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
819 Points -84% Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedXiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
6593 Points +28%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
5575 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
5151 Points Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
5151 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
4739 Points -8%Average of class Smartphone (62 - 7212, n=186, last 2 years)
2819 Points -45%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2778 Points -46%Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
825 Points -84% Steel Nomad Light ScoreXiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2483 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
2294 Points Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
2294 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2255 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1333 Points -42%Average of class Smartphone (132 - 2849, n=122, last 2 years)
1322 Points -42%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
872 Points -62% Steel Nomad Light Unlimited ScoreXiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2423 Points +5%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
2308 Points Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
2308 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1959 Points -15%Average of class Smartphone (132 - 2838, n=121, last 2 years)
1277 Points -45%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1268 Points -45%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
864 Points -63%GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenSamsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
120 fps Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
120 fps 0%Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
118 fps -2%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
112 fps -7%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
84 fps -30%Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 166, n=198, last 2 years)
59.5 fps -50%Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
29 fps -76%1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenXiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
223 fps +18%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
201 fps +6%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
196 fps +4%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
189 fps Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
189 fps 0%Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 332, n=198, last 2 years)
113 fps -40%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
103 fps -46%Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
46 fps -76%on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenSamsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
105 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
105 fps Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
105 fps 0%Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
82 fps -22%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
67 fps -36%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
61 fps -42%Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=199, last 2 years)
46.7 fps -56%Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
18 fps -83%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenXiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
79 fps +3%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
77 fps Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
77 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
71 fps -8%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
67 fps -13%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
45 fps -42%Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 129, n=198, last 2 years)
44 fps -43%Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
17 fps -78%3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenSamsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
42 fps +27%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
40 fps +21%Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
35 fps +6%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
33 fps Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
33 fps 0%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
23 fps -30%Average of class Smartphone (0.54 - 53, n=200, last 2 years)
20.7 fps -37%Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7.5 fps -77%Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5Average of class Smartphone (153 - 5210, n=35, last 2 years)
901 Points +103%Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
625 Points +41%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
482 Points +9%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
443 Points Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
443 Points 0% Half Precision NPU 1.5Average of class Smartphone (178 - 35890, n=35, last 2 years)
4072 Points +851%Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
633 Points +48%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
463 Points +8%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
428 Points Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
428 Points 0% Quantized NPU 1.5Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=35, last 2 years)
5869 Points +581%Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1274 Points +48%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
973 Points +13%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
862 Points Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
862 Points 0%CrossMark
OverallSamsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1863 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1444 Points Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=128, last 2 years)
1088 Points Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1050 Points Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
683 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
Points ProductivitySamsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1964 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1362 Points Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1147 Points Average of class Smartphone (198 - 2084, n=128, last 2 years)
1046 Points Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
732 Points CreativitySamsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1787 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1589 Points Average of class Smartphone (163 - 1962, n=128, last 2 years)
974 Points Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
938 Points Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
603 Points ResponsivenessAverage of class Smartphone (239 - 13042, n=128, last 2 years)
2229 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1802 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1293 Points Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1132 Points Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
805 Points Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (56.4 - 469, n=35, last 2 years)
223 Points +6%Average Samsung Exynos 2500 (n=1)
210 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500, Xclipse 950, 12288
209.864 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Honor Magic V FlipNubia Flip 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-579%-3%-18%12%40%8% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)4044.674083.53 1%1947.4 -52%967.4 -76%3930.68 -3%3658 ?(1493 - 4384, n=49) -10%2214 ?(270 - 4370, n=185, last 2 years) -45% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)2981.823894.12 31%1672.06 -44%766.69 -74%2603.84 -13%2703 ?(555 - 3484, n=49) -9%1820 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=185, last 2 years) -39% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)366.98403.94 10%277.55 -24%263.87 -28%445.5 21%379 ?(218 - 483, n=49) 3%294 ?(47.6 - 504, n=185, last 2 years) -20% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)143.67534.73 272%297.97 107%295.55 106%202.97 41%393 ?(50.7 - 730, n=49) 174%339 ?(9.4 - 964, n=185, last 2 years) 136%
游戏
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7; Dead Trigger 2: Ø115.9 (107-120) Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7; Genshin Impact: Ø56.7 (43-61) Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø88.8 (70-91) Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (55-61) Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (36-42)
Max. LoadIdle
51.5 °C49.7 °C29.1 °C 51 °C47.1 °C28.2 °C 49.7 °C44.3 °C27.7 °C
Maximum: 51.5 °CAverage: 42 °C
27.6 °C47.7 °C49.7 °C28 °C45.6 °C49.6 °C27.6 °C38.8 °C47.2 °C
Maximum: 49.7 °CAverage: 40.2 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
25.8 °C25.5 °C24.2 °C 25.6 °C24.7 °C24.5 °C 25.8 °C25.7 °C24.3 °C
Maximum: 25.8 °CAverage: 25.1 °C
23.9 °C24.4 °C25.3 °C23.7 °C25 °C25.1 °C23.8 °C24.9 °C24.9 °C
Maximum: 25.3 °CAverage: 24.6 °C Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.5 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityNubia Flip 5GAdreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +115%Honor Magic V FlipAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 % +21%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.3 % Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
43.6 % -6% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestNubia Flip 5GAdreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % +101%Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
85.8 % +75%Honor Magic V FlipAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.8 % +12%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 % Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.7 % -23% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityXiaomi Mix Flip 2Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
81.7 % +57%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.6 % +8%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.2 % Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityHonor Magic V FlipAdreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.1 % +40%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.7 % Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % -2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø18.3 (15.8-32.2) Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø34.3 (33.2-38.7) Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø21.4 (17.7-34) Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø33.3 (31.9-39)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 45% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 139)
18h 54min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip74300 mAh
18.9 h Xiaomi Mix Flip 25165 mAh
20 h Honor Magic V Flip4800 mAh
19.3 h Nubia Flip 5G4310 mAh
15.9 h Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G4000 mAh
15.5 h
Notebookcheck 总体评分Galaxy Z Flip7 比上一代产品更薄、更轻、更快。通过长期的安全和系统更新，三星的翻盖手机也为未来做好了充分准备。
Back to the verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
- 08/31/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Chassis89%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device93%
Connectivity66 / 69 → 95%
Weight89%
Battery92%
Display91%
Games Performance34 / 55 → 61%
Application Performance81 / 85 → 95%
AI Performance28%
Temperature84%
Noise100%
Audio78 / 90 → 86%
Camera81%
Average81%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions92.1%Materials75%Packaging90%Power Use95.9%Repairability80%Software Updates100% Total Sustainability Score: 88.8%
替代设备一览
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.86.2%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7Samsung Exynos 2500 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 950 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: $1,069.99List Price: 1199€188 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"2520x1080397 PPIAMOLED
2.85.9%Xiaomi Mix Flip 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $8.99QWFORQW [2+2 Pack for Xiaomi...2. $8.99QWFORQW [3 Pack Screen Prote...3. $6.99QWFORQW 2 Pack Camera Lens P...List Price: 970€199 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.86"2912x1224460 PPIAMOLED
3.80.2%Honor Magic V FlipQualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 730 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $15.99YOUULAR [2 Pack Privacy Scre...2. $14.99YOUULAR [2 Pack Screen Prote...3. $19.95BoxWave Screen Protector Com...193 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2520x1080403 PPIOLED
4.85.4% v7 (old)Nubia Flip 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 644 ⎘8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1Amazon: 1. $21.83Lkfyyds for ZTE Nubia Flip 5...2. $13.80Rfvzubemok Compatible with Z...3. $3.24ZXL Case for NUBIAS 5G Retro...List Price: 599€214 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.90"2790x1188439 PPIOLED
5.84.7%Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: $799.97List Price: 1319€187 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2640x1080426 PPIDynamic AMOLED 2X
More articles related to this deviceSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (Galaxy Z Flip7 Series)News•三星需要重新思考可折叠手机，重塑翻盖手机 |News•测试预览：三星 Exynos 2500 与 Snapdragon 8 Elite 相比速度如何？ |News•三星Galaxy Z Flip 7 拆机发现铰链很脏 |News•翻转 7：Redditor 的相机投诉在帖子被删除之前就已征得同意 |News•售价高达 11,000 美元：三星Galaxy Z Fold 7 和 Flip 7 采用黄金和真陨石打造奢华版本 |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold 7：多张官方营销图片和规格表泄露，看不到 S Pen |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold 7、Flip 7 (FE)、Galaxy Watch 8 和 Watch Ultra (2025) 将晚于预期上市 |News•三星Galaxy Z Flip 7：首段上手视频展示了可折叠手机的开启和四面效果 |News•三星Galaxy Z Flip7：首张野外照片揭示了盖板显示屏的实际效果 |News•三星意外确认所有Galaxy Z Fold 7 和Galaxy Z Flip 7 (FE) 配置 |News•三星Galaxy Z Flip 7：泄露的官方保护壳，包括磁性 Qi2 保护壳 |News•泄密者：三星Galaxy Z Fold 7 和 Flip 7 将比预期更薄 |News•Ultra Unpacked：三星宣布举办Galaxy Z Fold7、Flip7、Flip7 FE 和Galaxy Watch 8 发布会 |News•三星Galaxy Unpacked：Galaxy Z Fold7、Flip7、Flip7 FE 和 Watch 8 发布会最终日期和时间泄露 |News•Galaxy 未包装：三星或已透露 Z Fold7、Flip7 和 Watch 8 的发布日期和地点Galaxy |News•三星认真起来：Galaxy Z Fold 7 将有许多新奇功能，但 Unpacked 发布会可能会稍晚一些举行 |News•甚至早于谷歌的 Pixel 10：三星Galaxy Z Fold 7 和 Flip 7 可能推出Android 16 |News•三星Galaxy Z Fold7 和Galaxy Z Flip7 配备了更高效的显示屏：泄密者说出了主要功能和亮点 ...
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 637984 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!